A New York prosecutor told jurors that the hush-money payment at the heart of former U.S. president Donald Trump’s criminal trial was an attempt to “hoodwink the American voter” during the 2016 election, as lawyers made their closing arguments on Tuesday.

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said the $130,000 US payment that ensured porn star Stormy Daniels would not discuss an alleged sexual encounter was part of a broad effort to bury stories that might have damaged his first White House bid.

“We’ll never know if this effort to hoodwink the American voter impacted the election, but that’s something we don’t need to prove,” Steinglass said.

Jurors could begin deliberating as soon as Wednesday in the first criminal trial of a U.S. president. The trial was due to resume at 10 a.m. ET  with the judge issuing instructions to the jury.

Trump, 77, faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business documents to cover up the payment to Daniels. He has pleaded not guilty, denies ever having had sex with her and appeared to be unimpressed with Steinglass’s closing argument.

“BORING!” Trump wrote on social media during a break.

Don’t trust Cohen: defence

Earlier in the day Trump’s lawyer told jurors they should not trust star witness Michael Cohen, who testified that, as Trump’s fixer, he paid Daniels out of his own pocket and worked out a plan with Trump to be reimbursed through payments disguised as legal fees.

Defence lawyer Todd Blanche said Cohen, a convicted felon with a long track record of lying, had misled jurors when he said he discussed the payment and the reimbursement plan with Trump.

Closeups of signed cheques are shown.
Copies of cheques from Trump to his lawyer, Michael Cohen, are shown as exhibits at his trial. While Cohen and Stormy Daniels have been notable witnesses, the jury could decide the case is based on what it’s seen of documents concerning the payments in question. (Jon Elswick/The Associated Press)

Steinglass countered that Cohen’s dishonesty was a reflection of Trump’s malign influence.

“Mr. Trump not only corrupted those around him. He also got them to lie to cover it up,” the prosecutor said.

Blanche urged jurors to set aside their personal views of Trump — the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential candidate — and determine whether prosecutors had proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt, the standard required by U.S. law.

“If you focus just on that evidence you heard in this courtroom, this is a very, very quick and easy not-guilty verdict,” Blanche told the court.

Former U.S. president Donald Trump is seen walking toward a Manhattan courtroom on Tuesday, May 28, 2024.
Trump, centre, walks to the courtroom upon arriving at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on Tuesday. (Julia Nikhinson/Reuters)

Steinglass likewise urged jurors to ignore the politics surrounding the case. “The law is the law. And it applies to everyone equally. There is no special standard for this defendant,” he said as he wrapped up his remarks.

Justice Juan Merchan then dismissed jurors for the night and said he would instruct them on Wednesday about how to conduct their deliberations.

If found guilty, Trump faces up to four years in prison, although imprisonment is unlikely for a first-time felon convicted of such a crime.

A conviction will not prevent Trump from trying to take back the White House from U.S. President Joe Biden, the Democrat incumbent, in the Nov. 5 election — nor will it prevent him from taking office if he wins. Opinion polls show the two men locked in a tight race.

Election was Trump’s concern: prosecutor

Blanche said Daniels sought to blackmail Trump by threatening to go public with her story as he battled a string of unflattering stories about sexual misconduct in the final weeks of the 2016 campaign.

The defence has argued he approved the hush-money payment to spare his family the embarrassment.

WATCH | Trump’s hush-money trial enters final phase:

Lawyers make closing arguments at Trump hush-money trial

The prosecution and defence make their arguments at the Donald Trump hush-money trial, where the prosecution is arguing the evidence is irrefutable and the defence argues Trump is the real victim and key witness Michael Cohen can’t be trusted.

Steinglass said Trump was concerned that her story might hurt his campaign, not his family and said it was irrelevant if Daniels was seeking a payday, because Trump broke the law by covering up the hush money payment.

“You cannot lie in your business records, and that’s what this case is really about at its core: cheating,” he said.

Blanche drew a reprimand from the judge overseeing the trial for telling jurors that the evidence was insufficient to send Trump to prison. Jurors are tasked with assessing guilt or innocence, while judges determine punishment of those found guilty.

Merchan told jurors after they returned from lunch to ignore that statement. “That comment was improper and you must disregard it,” he said before prosecutors began their closing argument.

The charges brought against Trump are misdemeanours on their own, but prosecutors elevated them to felonies on the grounds that Trump was trying to cover up his unlawful efforts to promote his candidacy.

Blanche said prosecutors had not proven that there had been any underlying crime to cover up.

Trump faces three other criminal prosecutions, but none is likely to go to trial before this fall’s election.

He has pleaded not guilty in all of the cases and has called them an effort by Biden’s Democratic allies to hobble his presidential bid.



Source link www.cbc.ca