Article content

The City of Edmonton has been struck by another, unfortunate proposed property tax increase of 8.7 per cent, up from the 6.6 per cent approved by city council last fall. 

Every time tax increases are proposed, the Active Transportation Network Expansion funding comes under fire: “Why are we spending $100 million on bike lanes when our property taxes continue to increase?”

Advertisement 2

Article content

Article content

Ultimately, this property tax increase is not caused by our investments in active transportation infrastructure.

When we talk about this further 2.1-per-cent increase, we should zero in on the facts. Property taxes are again proposed to increase primarily due to increased WCB premiums, inflation (and increased labour costs due to union settlements), rapid population growth, and massive reductions in provincial funding. 

The $100 million for Active Transportation Network Expansion (otherwise known as crosswalks, shared-use paths, and bike lanes) contributes approximately 0.02 per cent to the 2024 operating budget. Since this is a massive infrastructure project, it is funded through the capital budget, and this spring budget adjustment focuses specifically on the operating budget. 

Cancelling our $100-million investment in active transportation infrastructure would make next to no impact on this property tax increase, as it is funded through debt servicing and the costs are split over decades. People deserve access to amenities and infrastructure within their communities, and an effective, citywide active transportation network is a key piece of that puzzle. 

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

Edmonton’s population is rapidly growing. We’ve had 100,000 people move here since 2021 alone. With the equivalent of the entirety of Red Deer moving into our city, we need to prioritize fiscally responsible methods of mobility so that Edmontonians can easily move around their city. 

That means investing in infrastructure that moves people, whether that’s people moving in cars, via transit, on bikes, or on their own two feet. Our investments should reflect the city we want to become, and with the city identifying a target of 50 per cent of trips taken by active transportation and transit as we grow to two million people, we need to invest in the infrastructure required to make this possible. 

We will continue to advocate for proportionally expanding funding for active transportation and transit infrastructure, since this supports building a city that provides more accessible and sustainable transportation options. 

Additionally, provincial infrastructure funding has plummeted since 2011, and municipalities are receiving less funding per capita even though our population continues to skyrocket. With less funding and more people to serve, we need to prioritize low-cost, and high-impact improvements to our city, like main street renewals or fixing missing links in our sidewalk network. Not building massive highways or overpasses.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Roads and mobility infrastructure are a service that municipalities should be investing in. They are, by definition, local. That is what property taxes are designed to go towards, and yet Edmonton has been forced to pick up the slack on downloaded provincial responsibilities, like homelessness, public health, and intermunicipal highways.  

So remember, when you see a further two-per-cent increase in your property taxes, it’s not because of bike lanes. Building roads, including bike lanes, is part of a municipality’s core mandate. It’s just the cost of what they do.

The increase is an additional two per cent because municipalities are being put in a vise, due to limited revenue generation and increasing responsibilities. Change is hard, but it’s needed now in order to support our growth into a fiscally responsible city through cheaper ways to move around our community. 

Shannon Lohner is the chair of Paths for People, a non-profit organization dedicated to making Edmonton a friendlier place to walk, roll and cycle. 

Article content



Source link edmontonjournal.com