Article content
EDMONTON — Ottawa must make changes to a self-government deal it struck with the Metis Nation of Alberta, says a Federal Court ruling.
The ruling, released Thursday, says the deal is too broad in its definition of who it covers and it was made without consulting two other Metis groups in the province.
Article content
“The only practical remedy is to quash the offending provisions of the agreement and to remit the matter to the minister for reconsideration,” wrote Judge Sebastien Grammond.
Article content
The deal was one of three signed by Metis groups in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario in February 2023 that recognized them as Indigenous governments, put them on equal constitutional standing with First Nations and opened the door to further negotiations, such as compensation for land lost.
It gave the groups control over who is a Metis citizen, leadership selection and government operations. And it brought them under federal legislation that gives Indigenous governments control over family and child welfare.
Two independent Alberta Metis groups complained that the agreement subsumed them under the Metis Nation of Alberta and did so without consulting them. They argued it gave the Metis Nation of Alberta exclusive ability to assert Metis rights in the province, something they had not consented to.
The Fort McKay Metis Nation and the Metis Settlements General Council, which hold the only Metis land bases in the province, wanted the court to throw out the entire agreement.
Recommended from Editorial
Article content
While Grammond agreed with their complaint, the judge ruled that disallowing the broad sections of the deal and requiring Ottawa to come to the table with the two dissenting groups was remedy enough.
“The agreement remains in place,” said Jason Madden, lawyer for the Metis Nation of Alberta.
“Those provisions were overly broad and do include an exclusivity in representation (for) the Metis Nation of Alberta. There’s clear direction from the court on how to address those offending provisions,” he said.
Lawyer Jeff Langlois, who represents Fort McKay, said the decision allows his client to pursue its own path to self-government outside the control of the Metis Nation of Alberta.
“For our constituency, there is a different path. And we want to make sure Canada has room to manoeuvre.”
He said his client plans to seek some form of self-government in talks the court has ordered Ottawa to open.
“That certainly would be my client’s goal,” he said.
Andrea Sandmaier, president of the Metis Nation of Alberta, said the group is examining the decision.
“Our over 65,000 citizens and our communities will continue to move forward on our vision for self-government that we have been advancing over 200 years,” she said in a statement. “Today’s decisions only strengthen our resolve to fully implement our nation-to-nation, government-to-government relationship with Canada.”
Share this article in your social network
