Tilly’s (TLYS) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Tilly’s (TLYS -4.39%)
Q3 2023 Earnings Call
Nov 30, 2023, 4:30 p.m. ET

Contents:

• Prepared Remarks
• Questions and Answers
• Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day and welcome to Tilly’s third-quarter 2023 results conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator instructions] Please also note, this event is being recorded. And I would now admire to turn the conference over to Gar Jackson, investor relations. Please go ahead.

Gar Jackson — Investor Relations

Good afternoon and welcome to the Tilly’s fiscal 2023 third-quarter earnings call. Ed Thomas, president and CEO; and Michael Henry, EVP and CFO, will converse the company’s results and then host a Q&A session. For a copy of Tilly’s earnings press release, please visit the investor relations section of the company’s website at tillys.com. From the same section, shortly after the conclusion of the call, you will also be able to find a recorded replay of this call for the next 30 days. Certain forward-looking statements will be made during this call that ponder Tilly’s judgment and analysis only as of today, November 30, 2023, and actual results may differ materially from current expectations based on various factors affecting Tilly’s business.

Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. For a more thorough discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with any forward-looking statements, please see the disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements. It is included in our fiscal 2023 third-quarter earnings release, which is furnished to the SEC today on Form 8-K, as well as our other filings with the SEC referenced in that disclaimer. Today’s call will be limited to one hour and will include a Q&A session after our prepared remarks.

I now turn the call over to Ed.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Gar. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We continue to believe that inflation remains a significant headwind on discretionary spending for our young family, young adult, teen, and preteen demographic. Despite what remains a challenging sales environment for us, I am proud of our team’s efforts toward protecting product margins, managing inventory, and controlling expenses. Our third-quarter results represent a sequential improvement from our first and second-quarter earnings results and exceeded our expectations primarily due to achieving stronger product margins and lower operating — lowering operating expenses more than we anticipated.

After starting the quarter with a negative 3.7% comp store sales refuse, in August, amid the peak of the need-driven back-to-school period, our comp sales decelerated sequentially in the post-back-to-school period to negative double digits in each of September and October. For the quarter, all geographic markets comped negative within a five-point range with reduced customer traffic across all store formats compared to last year. Total transaction volume was down high single digits, while the average transaction value was slightly higher than in last year’s third quarter. From a merchandising perspective, girls’ apparel and footwear comped positive, while all other departments comped negative during the third quarter. While acknowledging that the environment remains challenging for our customer demographic, we believe that we had some product content issues on our part that we are working to fix as quickly as we can.

Graphic tees has been an area of weakness for us within both men’s and women’s apparel, and we have been lacking sufficient fashion newness in women’s overall. Within accessories, a strong backpack business wasn’t enough to overcome declines in other areas. We believe we have identified certain opportunities to better our performance across departments as we finish fiscal 2023 and look into 2024. In terms of store real estate, we opened three new stores during the third quarter and an additional three stores just ahead of Thanksgiving. We currently expect to close four stores near the end of the fiscal year upon natural lease expiration.

For fiscal 2024, we — we currently foresee opening four new stores and have only one known store closure at this time. We have nearly 100 lease actions to consider for fiscal 2024 affecting almost 40% of our store portfolio. Given where our current operating margins are, we scheme to be aggressive in exiting stores that are not acceptably productive under current conditions and lease terms. Our preliminary expectation for total fiscal 2024 capital expenditures is approximately $15 million inclusive of new stores and ongoing distribution and technology enhancements. Turning to the fourth quarter for fiscal 2023. Total comparables net sales including both physical stores and e-comm decreased by 6.5% through November 28th, 2023, with store comps down 13.6% while e-comm was up 11% relative to last year’s comparable period.

The double-digit negative comps we saw in the post-back-to-school period over the final seven weeks of the third quarter continued into the first two weeks of the fourth quarter. However, the trend of our business began to better during the final two weeks of fiscal November, including 2.6% comp sales growth for Black Friday weekend, the five-day period from Thanksgiving Day through Cyber Monday. We believe this recent positive turn in our business was driven in part by a more aggressive promotional stance than we have historically taken to this period. Based on recent holidays seasons, we expect that our comp sales may slow down again in the early part of December before improving trendwise in the final days leading into Christmas. We are encouraged by the overall sequential improvement in our business trends over the last two quarters and are working diligently to attempt to speed up that improvement going forward.

I now turn the call over to Mike to converse our third-quarter operating results and fourth-quarter outlook in more detail. Mike?

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Thanks, Ed. Our third-quarter operating results compared to last year were as follows: Net sales were $166.5 million, a decrease of 6.4%. Net sales from physical stores decreased by 6.4% and represented 79.6% of total net sales, matching last year, while e-commerce net sales decreased by 6.2% and represented 20.4% of total net sales. Comparable net sales including both physical stores and e-commerce decreased by 9%. We ended the third quarter with 249 total stores, a net boost of two stores since the end of last year’s third quarter.

Gross margin including buying, distribution, and occupancy expenses was 29.3% of net sales, compared to 30.7% of net sales last year. Buying, distribution, and occupancy costs deleverage by 90 basis points on lower net sales despite decreasing by $1 million collectively. Reduced freight costs within distribution were partially offset by higher occupancy costs as a result of two net additional stores compared to last year and increased common area maintenance expenses overall. Product margins were just 50 basis points below last year and improved sequentially this year by 80 basis points compared to the second quarter and by 170 basis points compared to the first quarter. Total SG&A expenses were $51.2 million, or 30.8% of net sales, compared to $48.3 million, or 27.1% of net sales last year. Primary increases in SG&A were attributable to noncash store asset impairment charges of $1.7 million, marketing expenses of $0.7 million, and combined store and corporate payroll and related benefits expenses of $0.7 million.

Operating loss was $2.5 million, or 1.5% of net sales, compared to operating income of $6.3 million, or 3.6% of net sales last year. Other income was $1.3 million, compared to $0.7 million last year, primarily as a result of earning higher rates of return on our marketable securities this year. Income tax benefit was $0.3 million, or 28% of pre-tax loss, compared to income tax expense of $1.8 million, or 26.3% of pre-tax income last year. Net loss was $0.8 million, or $0.03 per share, compared to net income of $5.1 million, or $0.17 per diluted share last year. Weighted average shares were 29.9 million this year, compared to 30 million last year. Turning to our balance sheet.

We ended the third quarter with total cash and marketable securities of $94 million and no debt outstanding. This compared to $106 million and no debt outstanding last year. We ended the third quarter with inventories at cost up 0.8% per square foot and unit inventories down 3.2% per square foot compared to last year. Total year-to-date capital expenditures were $10.5 million this year, compared to $11.9 million last year. Turning to our outlook for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, please note that this year’s fourth quarter includes an extra week, making it a 14-week quarter compared to 13 weeks last year. Based on our quarter-to-date comparable net sales results in current and historical trends, we currently foresee our total net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023 to be in the range of approximately $172 million to $178 million, translating to an estimated comparable net sales decrease in the range of approximately 6% to 9%.

We expect SG&A to be approximately $55 million to $56 million, pre-tax loss to be in the range of approximately $5 million to $8 million, our estimated income tax rate to be approximately 26%, and loss per share to be in the range of $0.12 to $0.20 based on estimated weighted average diluted shares of approximately 29.9 million. We currently expect to end fiscal 2023 with 248 total stores, a net decrease of one store from the end of fiscal 2022. Operator, we’ll now go to our Q&A session.

Questions & Answers:

Operator

Thank you. We’ll now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator instructions] And our first question comes from Jeff Van Sinderen with B. Riley. Please go ahead.

Jeff Van Sinderen — B. Riley Financial — Analyst

Hi, everyone, and I know you mentioned some things that you’re working on in terms of merchandise content. And I guess I’m wondering now that your new CMO has been there for a little bit, maybe you can just speak more about the opportunities that you’re seeing to better merchandise content. I know you mentioned graphic tees, but maybe there’s other areas where you feel admire, you know, you’ve got more opportunity, maybe concentration of various categories. Just any other color you can add there?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Hi, Jeff. I would say the single biggest category where we have opportunity is on women’s fashion tops. And that was — the content, actually, we have is good; we just didn’t have enough. So, I think one of the things that she — that Laura’s been working on is doing a better job of timing of the seasonality of certain goods but also shifting from categories that are underperforming admire graphic tees, which has been a very strong category for a long time, into more fashion tops.

I wouldn’t say there would be any drastic changes to any particular categories at all.

Jeff Van Sinderen — B. Riley Financial — Analyst

OK, good. And then, I know you mentioned a little bit higher promotional activity this year around the Black Friday weekend and you were positive comps. And maybe you can just talk about a couple of things around inventory, how you’re positioned in the inventory, and the areas that are selling well. In other words, do you have enough of the stuff that’s moving well — or moved well in Black Friday weekend? And maybe just touched on — on the — the planned promotional cadence this year versus last year for the remainder of Q4.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

I would say the single biggest change we made from what we’ve done historically is we simplified the promotions into percent-off as opposed to a lot of BOGOs. We simplified that and that drove business across pretty much across — positive business across all categories for a couple of days, for sure. And we weren’t as aggressive as what of a lot of our peers were in terms of what that percent-off was. But it was a different approach for us, and it definitely simplified the buying process with our customers.

Jeff Van Sinderen — B. Riley Financial — Analyst

OK —

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Inventory — inventory is in pretty good shape, Jeff.

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Yeah, overall, our inventory age is better than it was at this time a year ago. So, feel good about level of inventory and content of that inventory as we sit here right now. And then, you also asked about Q4 promo cadence. And so, we have various planned promotions on the biggest days of the season coming up and the, you know, big weekend days that are — that are in between here and Christmas that would be fairly consistent with what we’ve done traditionally.

Jeff Van Sinderen — B. Riley Financial — Analyst

OK. Are you shifting those though to doing more of the percentage off versus the BOGOs since those worked on Black Friday weekend?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

It’s mixed, jeff.

Jeff Van Sinderen — B. Riley Financial — Analyst

The mix, OK, OK, fair enough. I’ll let someone else jump in. I’ll take the rest offline. Thank you.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

OK, thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Matt Koranda with ROTH MKM. Please go ahead.

Mike Zabran — ROTH MKM — Analyst

Hey, guys, it’s Mike Zabran on for Matt. Could you just talk a little bit more about the divergence between quarter-to-date store comps versus the e-commerce comp? I assume more promotions through the website’s translating to better performance relative to stores, but just any other dynamics to call out here?

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Nothing specific to point to. It’s — it’s been kind of surprising to us, quite honestly, to see that kind of divergence between stores and e-comm. We normally don’t see that wide of a — of a gap. So, honestly, I’m not sure if it’s just customer convenience at this early stage of the holiday season of people deciding to shop online as opposed to physically going to stores. It’s been a surprising divergence.

There is a little higher level of promotions online than in stores because we do tend to clear a lot of our, you know, kind of end — end-of-life, red tagged goods online. So, there is a — there is pretty consistently a higher level of promos online than in stores generally, but that’s the case all year long usually.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, that’s pretty typical. And, you know, there’s clearly been a challenge in physical store traffic out there and part of I think has been more convenience orientated than not. And we offer it — offer our full assortment in every store and online, so the choice — choices were very similar. I think it was probably customer choice of what channel they want to shop in.

Mike Zabran — ROTH MKM — Analyst

Got it. It makes sense. I guess on — on health of inventory, any guideposts, or just what are we looking to see to get inventory growth back in line with comps?

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Yeah, it’s not too far off now. I mean we ended the quarter, on a unit basis, down 3% and change versus the minus 6% comp. So, it’s not too far apart as we speak. And as I mentioned earlier to Jeff’s question, the inventory is more current right now than it was at this time last year.

So, you know, we always endeavor to get inventory comp as close to sales comp as — as we can. And if we’re going to have a negative comp fourth quarter as indicated by our outlook, we’d expect to end the year with inventories down.

Mike Zabran — ROTH MKM — Analyst

Got it. Makes — makes sense. Last one for me. For fiscal ’24, can you just help us grasp a little bit more what’s behind the lower store outlook? Four — four stores just seems a little bit behind normal cadence.

Does that represent a more cautious view you might have on the consumer? Is it more macro? Or is it more so around the 100 or so lease actions that you referenced earlier in the call?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

It’s totally driven by what we — we’re being cautious because of the uncertainty of what the consumer environment is being — going to be. We have several stores in the pipeline that are targeted for expansion for us that are being negotiated. And when we deduce that there’s more consistency in the environment out there, we’ll be in a good position to speed up that growth when that time comes.

Mike Zabran — ROTH MKM — Analyst

Makes sense. That’s all for me, guys. Thanks.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Marni Shapiro with The Retail Tracker. Please go ahead.

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

Hey, everybody. I have a couple of questions. I did want to follow up on the conversation you were just having. First, on the promotions over the holiday season, you advance to more percent-off.

I thought it was, by the way, really effective in the stores. It caught my eye, and I wrote about it and had pictures about it. I’m curious if you saw a difference. Do people buy fewer units, or were they — the same number of units go out the door, it just made it easier for people to shop?

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

It was lower units, and the average transaction value ended up lower. So, we did get feedback from our store teams and district managers that it was well received by customers generally because it is, you know, so much easier to think about and supervise than BOGOs throughout — throughout the assortment. So, it seemed to get a good response in terms of how the customers viewed it, but it did end up eroding our transaction value in units per transaction.

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

That — that makes sense. But I always think that shoppers don’t admire to do math when they’re in the store. So, if you can make it a little bit easier for them, it always helps.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, yeah.

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

And then, I’m just curious because I, too, was looking at the numbers between online and in-store. And I’m curious if you guys have — is there a difference in what they’re buying? Because I find, when I’m on your site, it’s — your fashion content on the women’s side, even in women’s tops as which you had referenced is — is really kind of good. And then, you have things admire the cropped puffer vests and things admire that, which online, is all this stuff is really easy to get to and find and I find in your stores. And probably alluding to, you know, some of the issues going on in the stores, it’s not always so easy to find those items, and she has to do a little bit of work to find them. So, I’m curious if you’re seeing more fashion go out the door online than in stores, or if that might be driving more of what’s going on online versus in stores.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

No, actually, it’s — it’s been the store — on the women’s side, the stores have been consistently better than online for us, but it’s improved because we’ve made some very targeted changes to improving how we merchandise online. We’re not done yet, but certainly, we’ve made and we’ve seen positive results as a result of that. But I really think it was just a matter of the way the customer chose to shop as opposed to the particular visual merchandising or the assortment.

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Because it’s just been in the month of November that we’ve seen this divergence. When you look back at the third quarter, stores and e-comm comps were within 1% of each other. So, we have very consistent performance between stores and e-comm throughout the third quarter. And then, suddenly, we get to November, and this divergence emerged.

And, you know, it was a little surprising to us, honestly.

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

Yeah, that’s definitely a little strange. And then, I’m just also curious, you know, some of the pressure that you’ve seen, especially on the junior side — but even just overall, the junior side has had some good sell-throughs. Are you seeing better sales coming out of your own brand versus other — other brands? Because you’re — you’re — especially on the junior side, I think your fashion on your own brands has been pretty good, admire really good. And so, I’m just curious if you’re able — are there kind of gaps in the market with branded goods that you’re able to make up with your own brand? And is that outpacing what your — you know, what the market goods are doing?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, our best brand continues to be RSQ, our own brand.

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

Right.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

And it crosses over in multiple categories, it’s good. And it’s intentionally developed and designed to fill in where we think there are voids from what the brands have offered us, what we’re able to safeguard from outside brands. So, it’s always a balancing act. And, you know, there’s never any one point in time where it stays the same forever. It just doesn’t, and it changes.

And, you know, I think we have a pretty experienced team on the women’s side that — they’ve been around for a while and they know the market well, and they adjust accordingly.

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

All right. Thank you so much. Best of luck for holiday then.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Mitch Kummetz with Seaport Research. Please go ahead.

Mitch Kummetz — Seaport Research Partners — Analyst

Yes, thanks for taking my questions. Hey, Ed, on the assortment, you mentioned, you know, women’s fashion tops doing well, but you don’t have enough, graphic tees being weal. admire, how quickly can you adjust? And if so, admire, is that potentially, you know, benefit to comp once you get that sorted out?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

We can adjust pretty quickly in almost every category. I mean bottoms and shoes, guide times are a lot longer than apparel. And so — but, you know, where we saw the opportunity was really again in — in tops where we did adjust on the fly. And we think that — you know, we think we’ve made a lot of changes that will positively impact the business in the categories where we felt we were maybe underrepresented.

Mitch Kummetz — Seaport Research Partners — Analyst

Any concerns on graphic tees in terms of that inventory? If it’s been weak, that — that might demand some more markdowns, or any issues there?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Not really. I mean, I think that we shifted our focus in some of the types of licenses that we went after. We were in all these categories admire music and sports. And we just — we didn’t — probably didn’t advance quick enough to get into some of these fresh categories because the graphics business has been so — so positive for us for so long. We were somewhat surprised at some of the changes.

But we can adjust. And we will adjust, and I don’t — there’s no real markdown liability there.

Mitch Kummetz — Seaport Research Partners — Analyst

OK, and then, on — on footwear, positive comp in the quarter, what’s driving that? Is there just better trend in footwear now, or is it more about product availability? I know that some of the vendors there had issues — supply chain issues, and I know that’s been kind of cleared up. So, is it just that you have better inventory, or are you seeing better trend there as well?

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

I think it’s more availability of certain brands admire Nike. Our —

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

And Converse and Reebok, mm hmm.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

We’ve seen — yeah, New Balance. We’ve seen — you know, we brought in a couple of new brands which are not a major part of the assortment but certainly new to us — recently new to us. And then, brands that we’ve carried for a long time admire Nike, we saw improvement in the inventory availability.

Mitch Kummetz — Seaport Research Partners — Analyst

And then, lastly, Mike, just on the product margin, I think you said it was down 50 bps in the quarter. How are you thinking about that for Q4?

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

We’ll — if we’re at the better end of our outlook, we would actually expect our product margins to be slightly up. If we’re at the bottom end of our range, we might be slightly down, not much different than what we just saw in the third quarter at this time based on what we currently know.

Mitch Kummetz — Seaport Research Partners — Analyst

All right. Thanks, guys. Good luck.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

This will deduce our question-and-answer session. I’ll turn the conference back over to Ed Thomas for any closing remarks.

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, all, for joining us on the call today. We look forward to sharing our fourth-quarter results with you in mid-March 2024. Have a good evening, everyone.

Operator

[Operator signoff]

Duration: 0 minutes

Call participants:

Gar Jackson — Investor Relations

Ed Thomas — President and Chief Executive Officer

Mike Henry — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary

Jeff Van Sinderen — B. Riley Financial — Analyst

Mike Zabran — ROTH MKM — Analyst

Marni Shapiro — The Retail Tracker — Analyst

Mitch Kummetz — Seaport Research Partners — Analyst

More TLYS analysis

All earnings call transcripts