Radiant Logistics, Inc. (NYSE:RLGT) Q2 2024 Earnings Conference Call February 8, 2024 4:30 PM ET
Company Participants
Bohn Crain – Founder, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Todd Macomber – Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Jason Seidl – TD Cowen
Mark Argento – Lake Street Capital
Kevin Gainey – Thompson Davis
Jeff Kauffman – Vertical Research Partners
Operator
Good day, everyone. This afternoon, Bohn Crain, Radiant Logistics Founder and CEO; and Radiant’s Chief Financial Officer, Todd Macomber will provide a general business update and discuss financial results for the company’s second fiscal quarter and six months ended December 31, 2023. Following their comments, we will open the call to questions. This conference is scheduled for 30 minutes.
This conference may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The company has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the company that may cause the company’s actual results or achievements to be materially different from the results or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
While it is impossible to identify all the factors that may cause the company’s actual results or achievements to differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements. Such factors include those that have in the past and may in the future be identified in the company’s SEC filings and other public announcements, which are available on the Radiant website at www.radiantdelivers.com. In addition, past results are not necessarily an indication of future performance.
Now, I’d like to pass the call over to Radiant’s Founder and CEO, Bohn Crain. Sir, the floor is yours.
Bohn Crain
Thank you, Alex. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining in on today’s call. Our results for the quarter ended December 31, 2023, continue to reflect the difficult freight markets being experienced by the entire industry as well as our operations. This extended period of weak freight demand combined with excess capacity continues to negatively impact not only our current results but also the year-over-year comparison to our record results for the prior year period.
With that said, we remain optimistic that we are at or near the bottom of the cycle and we would expect markets to begin to find their way to more sustainable and normalized levels towards the back half of calendar 2024. Notwithstanding the tough year-over-year comparisons, we continue to deliver meaningfully positive results and have generated $16.9 million in adjusted EBITDA and $12.1 million in cash from operations for the six months ended December 31, 2023.
In addition, we continue to enjoy a strong balance sheet, finishing the quarter with approximately $33 million of cash on hand and nothing drawn on our $200 million credit facility. As previously discussed, we believe we are well positioned to navigate through these slower freight markets. As we find our way back to more normalized market conditions.
At the same time, we remain focused on delivering profitable growth through a combination of organic and acquisition initiatives and thoughtfully re-levering our balance sheet through a combination of Asian station conversions, synergistic tuck-in acquisitions and stock buybacks. Through this approach, we believe, over time, we will continue to deliver meaningful value for our shareholders, operating partners, and the end customers that we serve.
In this regard, we are very excited about our recent agent station conversions with the acquisition of Delray and the select businesses which will combine, solidify our offering in support of the cruise line industry in South Florida.
We launched Radiant in 2006 with the goal of partnering with logistics entrepreneurs who would benefit from our unique value proposition and the built-in exit strategy available to the entrepreneurs participating in our network. We believe these two transactions are representative of a broader pipeline of opportunities inherent in our agent-based network and we look forward to supporting other strategic operating partners when they are ready to begin their transition from an agency to company-owned location.
With that said, I’ll now turn it over to Todd Macomber, our CFO to walk us through our detailed financial results and then we’ll open it up for some Q&A.
Todd Macomber
Thanks, Bohn and good afternoon everyone. Today, we will be discussing our financial results, including adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended December 31, 2023. For the three months ended December 31, 2023, we reported net income attributable to Radiant Logistics of $985000 on $201 point million [ph] of revenues or $0.02 per basic and diluted share.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, we reported net income attributable to Radiant Logistics of $4.836 million on $278.1 million of revenues or $0.10 per basic and diluted share. This represents a decrease of approximately $3.851 million of net income over the comparable prior year period or 79.6%.
For adjusted net income, we reported $5.496 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023 compared to adjusted net income of $11.142 million for the three months ended December 31, 2022. This represents a decrease of approximately $5.646 million or approximately 50.7%.
For adjusted EBITDA, we reported $7.708 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023 compared to adjusted EBITDA of $16.203 million for the three months ended December 31, 2022. This represents a decrease of approximately $8.495 million or approximately 52.4%.
Moving along to the six-month results. For the six months ended December 31, 2023, we reported net income attributable to Radiant Logistics of $3.607 million on $411.9 million of revenues or $0.08 per basic and $0.07 per full diluted share. For the six months ended December 31, 2022, we reported net income attributable to Reading Logistics of $13.269 million from $609.1 million of revenues or $0.27 per basic and fully diluted share. This represents a decrease of approximately $9.662 million over the comparable prior year period or 72.8%.
For adjusted net income, we reported $12.46 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 compared to adjusted net income of $24.621 million for the six months ended December 31, 2022. This represents a decrease of approximately $12.575 million or approximately 51.1%. For adjusted EBITDA, we reported $16.873 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 compared to adjusted EBITDA of $34.871 million for the six months ended December 31, 2022. This represents a decrease of approximately $17.998 million or approximately 51.6%.
With that I will turn the call back over to our moderator to facilitate any Q&A from our callers.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Jason Seidl with TD Cowen. Your line is open
Jason Seidl
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, Bohn and Todd. A couple of questions for me guys. If I stick on the acquisitions. Can you talk us through sort of what to expect from an EBITDA basis? And is there going to be any ramp-up cost to the outside private company that you onboarded at least for the current quarter?
Bohn Crain
Thanks, Jason. So this is Bohn. To answer the question, I guess a couple of different ways. Historically, we’ve talked about kind of the kind of the inherent agency stations that at some point in time along the continuum are likely to seek their exit strategies and the rate at which that is occurring, we expect to continue to accelerate just based upon the demographics of our agency network. And they can vary in size from painting with a brush anywhere from $0.5 million to $2 million of incremental EBITDA to the bottom line would kind of be the typical profile.
And as a reminder to maybe some folks that aren’t as familiar with the mechanics, our agency stations when we buy in an agency station that ultimately manifests itself is margin expression defined as EBITDA divided by gross margin. So when we convert an existing agent station to a company-owned store, our revenues don’t increase, our gross margins really don’t increase. It’s just that the agency station commissions get eliminated and we onboard their local level labor and SG&A cost and that difference is effectively the profitability of that business that we have onboarded. So there’s really no incremental cost per se in terms of onboarding the acquisition.
And a little bit to the contrary and we talked about this in some of our calls in the past, in the early days when we were acquiring other agent-based networks there was redundant back-office infrastructure costs that we were able to capture. And so that was the cost synergy. We have a similar but slightly different opportunity at the node level of the network. As we acquire in our agency stations, there’ll be redundant costs two facilities as an example of various facilities. So there should be some incremental cost synergies available to us at the node level of the network as we continue to kind of make good on our brand promise and supporting our agent stations on their excess strategies over time. And it wouldn’t — we’re not going to do one of these a month, but it wouldn’t surprise me that if we were to do one quarter type thing, here over the next year or so just as our network folks are kind of approaching the point where they’re ready to ring bell. And we’re here to support them in that process as that occurs.
Jason Seidl
That makes sense. I’m sorry, I thought before that one was an agent and one was not. Bohn, when you take a step back and you look at the broader market on the forwarding side, a lot’s been going on both from the macro and geopolitical side. How is that impacting results? Or how do you see that impacting results here in the current quarter?
Bohn Crain
Well, it’s certainly slowed down, I think for everyone. And it — I think the general narrative is, it was obviously slow through December. I think it will continue to be slow relatively through the March quarter. And then I’m optimistic that we’ll start to see certainly sequential improvement after that as we kind of find our way back to some sense of normalcy. But we’ve got anything as you alluded to any number of kind of political or kind of geopolitical things going on and interest rates and all. There’s any number of kind of headwinds.
But I think we’re — I would like to think and believe we kind of have seen the worst of it and I’m pretty hopeful for improvement on the back half of the year. And for us kind of individually, I count us as fortunate to be where we are in terms of debt-free cash on the balance sheet. So kind of net-net, we’re intending to just continue to execute our core strategy right through the storm so to speak. And through the combination of kind of these tuck-in acquisitions conversions and stock buybacks.
Jason Seidl
Okay. I appreciate that color. One quick thing. Maybe Todd this is for you. Just good to see you guys buying back stock. It looks like you did it under $6, at current levels should we expect you to continue to support shares going forward?
Todd Macomber
Yes.
Jason Seidl
Love the clarification. Gentlemen, thank you for your time, as always.
Bohn Crain
You bet. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is coming from Mark Argento with Lake Street Capital. Your line is live.
Mark Argento
Hey, Bohn, hey, Todd. Just quickly, just following up on kind of the M&A scenario this conversation I should say, maybe could you just walk us through how many agent stations you have out there? What’s realistic over time the opportunity to buy those? And I know you mentioned kind of one a quarter but what — over time how do you envision this playing out? And does that pace continue to accelerate? I’m guessing from here on out? And can you deploy enough capital there that you don’t really need to look at anything outside of the core agent station market at this point. Maybe just walk us through kind of how you envision that point out?
Bohn Crain
Yes. Well, I think we have to begin with kind of recognizing or acknowledging. We’re here to support our agent stations on the timeline or timeframe that suits them. So, we kind of stand ready to support our partners but we’re not out twisting their arms trying to compel them to sell. So, it will ultimately depend on when they’re ready and we’ll be here to support them.
With that said, none of us are getting any younger, right? And so we have kind of back to the demographics folks are just naturally coming to a point where they’re deciding to kind of raise their hand and kind of move forward with some of those conversations.
So, we have roughly 80 agent stations in the network. So, there’s a big I guess in banker terms addressable market right of stations within our network that we can support over time. It’s hard to say kind of when exactly those would happen, but my is kind of the rate and frequency at which that happens will continue — I mean it won’t accelerate infinitely, but I wouldn’t expect us to do more than one a quarter, but that kind of feels kind of where we are right now in terms of what I could tell you kind of anecdotally is we’re actively talking to more of our stations now than we ever have in the history of the company. And I think it just comes back to the demographics
Mark Argento
That’s helpful. And just also maybe just remind us and if it’s changed at all but the typical structure in terms of part upfront and the rest that kind of an earn out as they hit their bogeys in terms of performance post positions?
Todd Macomber
Typically 50% upfront and then we’ll do typically a three-year earnout. Obviously, the targets the EBITDA targets.
Mark Argento
Great. That’s it from me. Thanks guys.
Bohn Crain
You bet.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is coming from Kevin Gainey with Thompson Davis. Your line is live.
Kevin Gainey
Hey Bohn and Todd. Actually to kind of continue the M&A kind of piece for agencies. Do you guys have maybe like a quantifiable EBITDA contribution that if you went and acquired theoretically all of those guys it would add up to.
Bohn Crain
Not off the top of our at top of our head, No. At least nothing that we’re prepared to disclose or kind of talk about on the call today. But I’ll take that as a homework assignment and maybe that’s something we can work at some future disclosures and then we would be in a better position to talk about it on this call.
Kevin Gainey
Yes. I just want the size of the opportunity for you guys from that standpoint.
Todd Macomber
We just don’t know what their operating costs are, right? We know what their gross margins are but we don’t know what their operating costs are. We don’t they’re not going to share that with us until we get in a position where we’re looking at the acquisition. So, part of it is known but not the complete picture.
Bohn Crain
Yes. But at least — begin to at least dimensionalize that as you can look on the face of our income statement at that line item of operating partner commissions, right? That’s our single biggest cost, right? And as we buy in the agency stations, that cost will go away as we convert them to agency stations. And then that will manifest itself as margin expansion, right, EBITDA is a function of gross margin. There’s our non-answer answer to you.
Kevin Gainey
Also maybe if we can talk about how you’re thinking about the second calendar, second half? What conditions or factors would you think would lead to that pickup?
Bohn Crain
Greater consumer confidence is part of it, right? We — I think generically we’re starting to see ocean volumes start to pick up, pricing start to pick up a little bit. So that’s encouraging not just for the ocean piece but for the inland piece and just kind of supply and demand dynamics for the inland transportation side of things.
Hopefully, that will continue to improve and kind of the geopolitical stuff will settle down, but again, that kind of remains to be seen. But we need a little better balance between shipper demand and transportation capacity and some of the weaker hands are being forced out whether it’s yellow or others, that’s helping the market rationalize at the end of the day in the, I guess what they call, constructive destruction that’s going on in the market.
Kevin Gainey
I appreciate the insight. That’s all.
Bohn Crain
All right. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question is coming from Jeff Kauffman with Vertical Research Partners. Your line is live.
Jeff Kauffman
Thank you very much. Good afternoon, guys.
Bohn Crain
Hey, Jeff.
Jeff Kauffman
Hey. It’s strange. As I sit here and kind of listen to all these earnings calls and everybody’s forward outlook, I think the consistent theme is, we feel we’re getting close but the fog is a little thicker and visibility isn’t that great right now. Would you disagree with that comment?
Bohn Crain
No. I think that’s very fair.
Jeff Kauffman
So when you talk about we feel like things could be turning is it more just — well, we know the inventory destock is done, we see trade starting to flow, ISMs getting better or are you actually seeing things maybe in some sub-industries or some parts of your network that leads you to believe that we could be bottoming on the curve here?
Bohn Crain
We’re seeing some early indications of things improving on the ocean — kind of on the ocean side in particular. So that’s helpful. I would say intermodal and truck brokerage is still probably the toughest area at least for us. And good news bad news it’s the smallest piece of our business. But that’s been certainly a tough go in this environment. Again at a high level our core forwarding business continues to do reasonably well. Canada continues to do reasonably well and international ocean is starting to improve modestly.
It was slow going in late November and December and early January as we’re watching, kind of, weekly postings in February things are starting to lift off of those lowest levels. And so hopefully that — and there’s obviously some seasonality in that that we would expect, none of that’s like revolutionary right? That’s kind of what we would generally expect. But I think that’s the dynamic. So I don’t have any hard evidence to offer into the courtroom today but…
Jeff Kauffman
There were other things in the courtroom today.
Bohn Crain
Yeah. Exactly.
Jeff Kauffman
So just following up on that. We are starting to see a little bit of a shift from goods coming into the East Coast to goods going into the West Coast. And some of that Suez some of that’s Panama Canal. Some of it’s a whole bunch of other things. Do you care, which coast it comes in on. I mean, I know you’ve got nationwide operations but is traffic coming in on the West Coast different for you than traffic coming in on the East Coast?
Bohn Crain
Historically we’ve had much more significant trade flows in the transpacific trade lane. So we would like — we’ve got more exposure to Transpac and Transatlantic, not that we don’t do both but we certainly have a bigger exposure on the transpac side. So I think as we see those trade flows improve for any number of reasons, I think that will be a net positive for us.
Jeff Kauffman
Okay. And then one last odd ball question here. Just given the news coming out of the Supreme Court today. What happened to your business the last time President Trump was in power and we had these tariffs on Chinese goods. Is that anything that affects you positively or negatively? Do the goods still flow but just a different way? Or does that negatively infect some of that Transpac business for you?
Bohn Crain
Well, I think that the short answer is the more complicated global trade gets, the more value we can provide to our customers. So tariffs and those types of things could impact some of that stuff, but that doesn’t mean trade stuff is happening, right? So things might flow a little differently but we’re not — and there certainly can be individual commodities that get impacted.
So it’s really kind of the facts and circumstances to know what specific tariffs are being impacted. And if that’s — I’m thinking of you something my battleship, B47 right? If it happens they hit a particular commodity that we’re servicing that we could be impacted. But it could having the same brand that could just as easily be helping come up with alternative solutions or alternative sourcing strategies that create incremental opportunities as well so.
Jeff Kauffman
All right. Awesome. Well, thank you both very much and congratulations.
Bohn Crain
Thank you.
Todd Macomber
All right. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. As we currently have no further questions in queue, I will hand the call back over to Mr. Crain for any closing comments.
Bohn Crain
Thank you. Let me close by saying that we remain optimistic about our prospects and opportunities to continue to leverage our best-in-class technology, robust North American footprint, extensive global network of service partners as we continue to build on the great platform we’ve created here at Radiant.
At the same time, we intend to thoughtfully delever our balance sheet and through a combination of age station conversions, synergistic tuck-in acquisitions and stock buybacks. Through this multi-pronged approach of organic growth acquisitions and buybacks, we believe we will continue to create meaningful value for our shareholders, operating partners and the end customers that we serve. Thanks for listening, and your support of Radiant Logistics.
Operator
Thank you. This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.
