Focus­ing on a “three-day week” as the greatest poten­tial out­come of Ofcom’s call for input on the future of Royal Mail is under­stand­able, but is less than half of the story (“Stamp duties: Big ser­vice cuts out­lined for Royal Mail”, Report, Janu­ary 25).

First, there’s the ques­tion of which days to cut. Cut­ting Sat­urdays might seem an obvi­ous answer, but as an import­ant day for deliv­er­ing busi­ness mail, it will demand a huge change in how organ­isa­tions com­mu­nic­ate with con­sumers. Not to men­tion no mail on the very day when people have time to read it.

Even more sig­ni­fic­ant is Ofcom’s sug­ges­tion of allow­ing three days longer to deliver let­ters by extend­ing the expec­ted qual­ity of ser­vice. Where this has been allowed to hap­pen in other coun­tries — for instance, in Greece — we have seen expect­a­tions even­tu­ally stretch to longer than a week. The res­ult is people ques­tion­ing whether it’s worth send­ing a let­ter in the first place, and ser­vices degrad­ing in a vicious cycle. Nobody argues against review­ing Royal Mail’s offer­ing. But if a func­tion­ing postal ser­vice is essen­tial to soci­ety, Ofcom needs ways to encour­age hit­ting deliv­ery tar­gets, rather than remov­ing them alto­gether.

David Beirne
Head of Postal Rela­tions, Quadi­ent, Lon­don E15, UK

Source link