““Every step we take closer to very powerful AI, everybody’s character gets plus 10 crazy points””
This is what Sam Altman had to say about the stresses of working with artificial intelligence as he revealed his own thoughts on the dramatic shakeup of OpenAI’s executive board last November.
The OpenAI chief blamed the stresses of working with AI for heightened tensions within the San Francisco company he helped to found in 2015, as he argued the “high stakes” involved in developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) had driven people “crazy”.
He explained that working with AI is a “very stressful thing” due to the pressures involved, as the tech CEO said he now expects “more strange things” to start happening across the globe as the world gets “closer to very powerful AI.”
“As the world gets closer to AGI the stakes, the stress, the level of tension – that’s all going to go up,” Altman said during a discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos. “For us, {the board shakeup] was a microcosm of it but probably not the most stressful experience we ever faced.”
Microsoft
MSFT,
is an investor in OpenAI, and at one point offered a job to Altman before blessing his reinstatement.
Altman said the lesson he has taken away from the shakeup that saw him removed as OpenAI’s CEO on Nov. 17 and reinstated on Nov. 21, is the importance of being prepared, as he suggested OpenAI had failed to deal with looming issues inside the company.
“You don’t want important but not urgent problems out there hanging. We had known our board had gotten too small and we knew that we didn’t have the level of experience we needed, but last year was such a wild year for us in so many ways that we sort of just neglected it,” he said.
“Having a higher level of preparation , more resilience, more time spent thinking about all the strange ways things can go wrong, that’s really important,” Altman added.
Speaking on a panel titled “Technology in a Turbulent World,” Altman also spoke about OpenAI’s legal dispute with the New York Times
NYT,
which saw the publication file a copyright lawsuit against the AI company in December over use of its articles in training ChatGPT.
Altman said he was “surprised” by the New York Times’ decision to sue OpenAI as he claimed the California company had previously been in “productive negotiations” with the publisher. “We wanted to pay them a lot of money,” Altman said.
The tech chief, however, sought to push back against claims that OpenAI is reliant on information gathered from the New York Times, as he instead claimed future AIs will be trained on smaller datasets obtained via deals with publishers.
“We are open to training on the New York Times but it’s not our priority. We actually don’t need to train on their data. I think that this is something people don’t understand,” Altman said.
“One thing that I expect to start changing is that these models will be able to take smaller amounts of higher-quality training data during their training process and think harder about it,” Altman added. “You don’t need to read 2,000 biology textbooks to understand high-school level biology.”
The OpenAI chief, however, acknowledged there is “a great need for new economic models” that would see those whose work is used to train AI models, rewarded for their efforts. He explained that future models could also see AIs link to publishers’ own sites.
The New York Times was approached by MarketWatch for comment.
