Chris Giles is right that UK labour mar­ket stat­ist­ics are no longer fit for pur­pose (“‘Offi­cial’ UK labour data is becom­ing a non­sense”, Opin­ion, Octo­ber 26). As the Office for National Stat­ist­ics acknow­ledges, labour force sur­vey response rates are too low to be reli­able.

The UK should rely instead on pay as you earn (PAYE) data. But that data is not as timely as people think. The gov­ern­ment only learns that someone is employed some­time after they are paid. A new employee might join too late in the month for that month’s payroll, lead­ing to more than two months between start­ing work and HM Rev­enue & Cus­toms know­ing that fact.

Gov­ern­ment should man­date com­pan­ies to tell HMRC when they hire someone, when they are placed under notice of redund­ancy, and when that per­son leaves vol­un­tar­ily, invol­un­tar­ily or for retire­ment.

Sur­veys would be lim­ited to try­ing to under­stand flows into and out of self-employ­ment.

Bet­ter data means bet­ter decisions — on interest rates, taxes and so on. The small addi­tional piece of red tape is entirely war­ran­ted.

Pro­fessor Tim Leunig
School of Pub­lic Policy, Lon­don School of Eco­nom­ics and Polit­ical Sci­ence Lon­don WC2, UK

Source link