Mar­tin Wolf (Opin­ion, Feb­ru­ary 5) asks, speak­ing of polit­ics, “how many able people will devote their lives to a strenu­ous and poorly paid career whose prac­ti­tion­ers are dis­trus­ted, if not des­pised”. The answer in all parts of the UK is almost none, because to be “able” means to have the capa­city to see sev­eral sides to an argu­ment.

This is what “able” busi­ness people, or pub­lic ser­vants, can do. UK polit­ics is however entirely struc­tured and con­trolled through polit­ical parties.

So the only people who can get into gov­ern­ment are those who want to join a polit­ical party in the first place (a self-select­ing group who are attrac­ted to organ­isa­tions and struc­tures, and per­haps have an appet­ite for hanging out with people who think as they do) and who can get selec­ted for a seat of some kind, by an even more extreme and nar­row-minded bunch — the people who like to sit on selec­tion com­mit­tees.

To take the parties in con­trol in the UK and Scot­land at the moment, can any­one ima­gine someone with the reas­on­able view that the UK really needs to mend fences with the EU get­ting selec­ted as a Con­ser­vat­ive can­did­ate?

Or someone who thinks Scot­tish inde­pend­ence could work, but only in cer­tain cir­cum­stances, and is not com­mit­ted one way or the other, being selec­ted to rep­res­ent the Scot­tish National party?

As long as parties demand­ing of ideo­lo­gical fealty con­trol the routes to office, few “able people” will apply.

Owen Kelly
Edin­burgh, UK

Source link