Harmonic Inc. (NASDAQ:HLIT) Q4 2023 Earnings Conference Call January 29, 2024 5:00 PM ET
Company Participants
David Hanover – Investor Relations
Patrick Harshman – President and Chief Executive Officer
Walter Jankovic – Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Simon Leopold – Raymond James
Ryan Koontz – Needham & Company
Steven Frankel – Rosenblatt Securities
George Notter – Jefferies
Tim Savageaux – Northland Capital
Operator
Welcome to the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Harmonic Earnings Conference Call. My name is Litzi and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Please note that this conference is being recorded. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]
I will now turn the call over to David Hanover, Investor Relations. David, you may begin.
David Hanover
Thank you, operator. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for Harmonic’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. With me today are Patrick Harshman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Walter Jankovic, Chief Financial Officer.
Before we begin, I’d like to point out that in addition to the audio portion of the webcast we’ve also provided slides for the webcast, which you may view by going to our webcast on our Investor Relations website.
Now turning to slide two. During this call, we will provide projections and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of the company. Such statements are only current expectations and actual events or results may differ materially.
We refer you to documents Harmonic filed with the SEC including our most recent 10-Q and 10-K reports and the forward-looking statements section of today’s preliminary results press release. These documents identify important risk factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements.
And please note that unless otherwise indicated, the financial metrics we provide you on this call are determined on a non-GAAP basis. These metrics, together with corresponding GAAP numbers and a reconciliation to GAAP are contained in today’s press release, which we have posted on our website and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K.
We will also discuss historical financial and other statistical information regarding our business and operation, and some of this information is included in the press release, the remainder of this information will be available on a recorded version of this call or on our website.
And now I’ll turn the call over to our CEO, Patrick Harshman. Patrick?
Patrick Harshman
Well, thanks, David, and welcome, everyone, to our fourth quarter call. Today, we reported our fourth quarter and full year results wrapping up 2023 with another quarter of solid performance including record total company revenue driven by continuing strong demand for our market-leading broadband and video streaming solutions.
Key highlights for the quarter included record broadband revenue demonstrating our Broadband business remains firmly on track for sustained multi-year growth, record Video SaaS revenue, exceeding $50 million for the year, powered by growing sports streaming success, and execution of a new $160 million credit facility, enhancing our financial flexibility.
We also delivered strong new bookings during the quarter with a book-to-bill of 1.2 and in 2023 with over $653 million of backlog and deferred revenue and positioning us well for 2024 and the coming years.
Moving now to our Broadband segment, we delivered segment revenue of $115.2 million, up 52% sequentially and 20% year-over-year. The number of global customers deploying our solution reached 108 million, up 19% year-over-year with corresponding 26.3 million DOCSIS cable modems now served worldwide, approximately 15% of cable modems deployed globally, again highlighting the substantial DOCSIS growth opportunity still in front of us.
We had several new customer wins during the fourth quarter, including a new Top 10 North American operator for whom we made initial shipments. Our pipeline of new customers remained strong, mostly by the expanding breadth and depth of our competitive advantages.
An important area of expanding competitive differentiation for Harmonic is DOCSIS 4.0. Our software core has seamlessly accommodated the new standard as have our Remote PHY edge device designs. We’re successfully powering several early DOCSIS 4.0 deployments launched late in the year and we are uniquely positioned as the go-to-partner for any operator planning a DOCSIS 4.0 launch or skilled deployment in 2024 or 2025.
As a reminder, our DOCSIS 4 nodes are fully backward compatible with DOCSIS 3.1. So the availability of DOCSIS 4 RF amplifiers is not a requirement for any operator who chooses to go forward and deploy Harmonics 4.0 capable nodes in 2024.
And we expect at least one key customer to make a big move to DOCSIS 4.0 enabled edge devices during 2024 leading to a slower pace of deployment early in the year as 4.0 node deployment expertise scales up followed by a heavier deployment pace in the second half.
Another important aspect of our broadband business is that we had greater revenue diversification during the fourth quarter with both Comcast and Charter contributing greater than 10% of our revenue. While at different places in their respective DAA architecture deployment journeys, we’re grateful to be working with both of these industry leaders and are incredibly focused on supporting their respective strategic initiatives.
Augmenting our growing multi-year pipeline of DOCSIS opportunities, we also continue to make solid progress during the fourth quarter on building a synergistic fiber-to-the-home business. In the fourth quarter, we secured several new fiber customer wins spanning existing cable and non-cable fiber-first operators.
We also announced a couple of compelling new fiber products that significantly expand our addressed market and our ability to compete with incumbent fiber-to-the-home competitors. Early customer response to these new products has been very encouraging. We’re ramping up our fiber specialist sales team and we remain very much on track to make fiber a strong strategic and financial contributor to our business.
So in summary on Broadband, our Broadband business continues to be well-positioned with unique and powerful technology advantages, solid customer relationships, strong backlog, and a rich array of new business opportunities that give us confidence in our multi-year growth outlook.
We finished 2023 with solid execution and considering our customers’ positive feedback, we’re confident in our ability to carry the strong execution forward through 2024 and beyond. So turning now to our Video segment. The highlight of the quarter was again SaaS revenue, $13.2 million, up 26% year-over-year.
Total segment revenue was $51.9 million, down from $68.3 million a year ago, while gross margin was a record 64.6%. These results reflect our continued intentional SaaS transformation and some macroeconomic headwinds overseas impacting our Appliance business. As mentioned previously, SaaS revenue for the year topped $50 million, up about 47% year-over-year mainly driven by streaming sports, live sports.
During the fourth quarter, we continued to see existing customers expand usage and new customers adopt and begin to launch services with our SaaS solution. This positive momentum has carried into 2024. Earlier this month, our SaaS powered the largest live streaming event ever in the US, a testament to our exceptional technology and service capabilities.
The market visibility of this extremely successful event has already translated into additional boost — an additional boost to our sales — SaaS sales pipeline. Our targeted ad monetization is key to the rationale for moving live content, especially live sports to streaming and it’s an important adjacent growth opportunity for us. As you may recall, we rolled out a new ad insertion SaaS earlier in 2023 and it was great to see several initial wins with this new service during the fourth quarter.
On the Appliance side of the business, which as a reminder is more capital intensive for our customers, we saw revenue stabilize despite several continuing instances of project delays associated with financing and other macroeconomic headwinds, particularly internationally. Our domestic Video Appliance business remained solid as does our overall pipeline and competitive position.
Finally regarding Video, our strategic review process is ongoing and continues to be a very high priority for us. Walter will speak more about this shortly. So, in conclusion, we ended 2023 on a solid note and with a robust backlog. This highlights the continued demand we’re seeing from our customers and the strong footing we have for further growth in 2024 and beyond.
With that let me turn it over to you, Walter, for a deeper discussion of our results and outlook.
Walter Jankovic
Thanks, Patrick, and thank you all for joining us today. Before I discuss our quarterly results as well as our outlook, I’d like to remind everyone that the financial results I’ll be referring to are provided on a non-GAAP basis.
As David mentioned earlier, our Q4 press release and earnings presentation includes reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP that are discussed on this call. Both of these are available on our website.
Our fourth quarter results were consistent with our expectations and above the midpoint of our guidance range on the top as well as the bottom line. Additionally, we exceeded the midpoint of revenue guidance in both Broadband and Video.
Before reviewing our Q4 2023 financials in detail, I’ll call out the highlights here on slide seven. For the quarter, we reported revenue of $167.1 million, which was an all-time company record and included record broadband revenue of $115.2 million.
We also reported EPS of $0.13, bookings of $196.5 million, a strong book-to-bill of 1.2, and near-record backlog and deferred revenue of $653.2 million. In a few moments I will provide detailed Q1 and full year 2024 guidance, prior to that, I’d like to highlight a few key points regarding our guidance.
For our Broadband business, we expect full year 2024 revenue to increase 24% year-over-year at the midpoint of our guidance. Based on the momentum we expect to see in the second half of 2024, we anticipate 2025 Broadband revenue growth to accelerate on a year-over-year basis.
As Patrick mentioned earlier, we are well-positioned with our leading technologies, strong backlog, and our customer success to drive continued multi-year growth. With regards to Video, we are guiding conservatively for FY’24 due to the ongoing strategic review.
Turning to slide eight. Total Q4 revenue was up nearly 2% year-over-year and 31.4% on a sequential basis. This quarter-over-quarter increase was due to growth in our Broadband segment. Looking more closely at Broadband, Q4 revenue was a record $115.2 million, an increase of 20% year-over-year. As anticipated, during the fourth quarter, we benefited from the initial shipments of another large Tier 1 customer.
In Video, Q4 revenue was $51.9 million, while video appliance sales were lower due to the factors I noted on our last earnings call, Video revenue included SaaS revenue of $13.2 million or 25.4% of segment revenue for the quarter, up 26% from the prior year. Video SaaS revenue growth continues to be driven by live sports streaming expansions and new customer wins. We continue to focus on growing our SaaS business and Video while maximizing our profitability in appliances despite current macroeconomic headwinds.
In our last earnings call, we announced the initiation of a formal strategic review process for our Video business, due in part to indications of interest we had received from a number of parties. We are continuing the strategic review process and it remains a top priority for us.
Having said that, as previously noted, node specific timetable has been established for the completion of the review. We are not providing any further details on this process unless and until a definitive agreement has been reached and our Board approves the transaction or decides to conclude the review.
Turning back to our fourth quarter results, we had two customers representing greater than 10% of total revenue during the quarter with Comcast representing 41% of total revenue and Charter representing 15% of total revenue. The total company gross margin was 49.3% for Q4’23 reflecting decreased gross margin in the Broadband business segment sequentially. Broadband gross margin was 42.4% for Q4’23, down 520 basis points year-over-year due to product mix.
To offer additional clarity, during Q4, we shipped out an extremely high mix of edge products that possess relatively lower margins compared to other products in our portfolio. Video gross margin was 64.6% in Q4’23, an all-time record for the business segment, even taking into consideration today’s macroeconomic headwinds and project delays that we’ve discussed previously. This margin improvement occurred across both SaaS and Appliances.
Moving down the income statement on slide nine, Q4’23 operating expenses were $63.4 million, up slightly both on a sequential and year-over-year basis. Adjusted EBITDA for Q4’23 was $21.7 million comprised of $21.9 million from Broadband and negative $0.2 million from Video.
Adjusted EBITDA for Broadband was in line with our expectations, while Video beat our expectations due in part to the gross margin strength previously discussed. This all translated into Q4’23 EPS of $0.13 per share in line with our prior guidance and compared with $0.00 in Q3’23 and $0.17 per share for Q4’22.
We ended the fourth quarter of 2023 with a calculated diluted weighted average share count of 115.7 million compared to 116.7 million in Q3’23 and 117.3 million in Q4’22. The sequential decrease is primarily due to the decreased convertible debt dilution of 1.1 million shares.
Turning to the order book. Q4 bookings were $196.5 million. The book-to-bill ratio was strong at 1.2 for the quarter. For both Q3’23 and Q4’22, our book-to-bill ratios were 0.8. As we stated previously, over time we expect this ratio to normalize and approach the historical benchmark of greater than 1.
For Q4, we were above 1 after being below 1 last quarter. Turning to the balance sheet on slide 10, we ended Q4’23 with cash of $84.3 million. The net $2.3 million sequential increase in cash and short-term investments was due to a few factors. Cash from operations provided $6.3 million due predominantly to a decrease in inventory and inventory-related deposits, offset by an increase in accounts receivable. We also used $2.7 million in the purchase of fixed assets.
Turning to accounts receivables and days sales outstanding at the end of Q4’23, DSO was 76 compared to 78 in Q3’23 and 59 in the prior year period. The prior year period was lower due to a large customer taking an early payment discount.
Days inventory on hand was 89 days at the end of Q4’23 compared to 145 at the end of Q3’23 and 140 at the end of Q4’22. The inventory decline in the quarter was a result of strong sales in Q4 and lower in feed as we continue to tighten our supply chain.
Turning to capital allocation. Our top priority remains driving our future growth. When appropriate, we will strategically invest in building inventory as we’ve done in the past to meet strong demand. In line with this strategy, in December we closed a five-year $160 million credit facility that included a $120 million revolving credit line and a $40 million delayed draw term loan.
This new credit facility allows us to repay our 2024 convertible notes outstanding while providing us with ample liquidity and flexibility to support our multi-year growth plans. As of today, we have not borrowed on this facility.
Tomorrow, Tuesday, January 30th, we will issue a notice to holders to redeem the entire $115.5 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 2024 convertible notes. As a result, holders of the convertible notes will have the right to convert their notes to shares of Harmonic common stock under the terms of the indenture.
We elected to settle any such conversions by paying cash equal to the principal amount and delivering common stock for any conversion value over par. We expect to use, our credit facility and cash on hand to fund the cash portion of the redemption and complete the redemption in Q2 of this year.
Additionally, with our enhanced liquidity position, we intend to step up our stock buybacks available under our current authorization of $100 million of which $5 million has been used to date. With that in mind, we plan to prudently manage our balance sheet by maintaining overall net leverage of around two times or less and available liquidity of no less than $100 million going forward.
In summary, due to the actions we’ve taken to strengthen our balance sheet, we believe we have sufficient available liquidity to continue funding our growth plans while returning capital to our shareholders through increased stock repurchases.
As we said previously, the timing and amount of any stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors including the price of Harmonic’s common stock, market conditions, corporate needs, and regulatory requirements.
At the end of Q4, total backlog and deferred revenue was $653.2 million. Our strong backlog reflects continued demand from our large broadband customers and growing Video SaaS commitments. Just over 50% of our backlog and deferred revenue have customer request dates for shipments of products and for providing services within the next 12 months. Lastly, we generated $3.5 million in free cash flow during the quarter.
Before reviewing the guidance, I would like to mention that given the ongoing strategic review process, we have decided to hold off on setting a date for the next Analyst Day. We expect to revisit this in the future.
Let’s now review our non-GAAP guidance for the first quarter beginning on slide 11. We expect broadband to deliver revenue between $70 million to $80 million, reflecting a technology transition at one of our largest customers. Gross margins between 46% to 47% due to product mix.
Gross profit between $32 million to $38 million and adjusted EBITDA between $4 million to $8 million. For the full year, we expect revenue between $460 million to $500 million. Gross margins between 46.5% to 48.5%, gross profit between $214 million to $243 million, and adjusted EBITDA between $95 million to $119 million.
For Broadband, we expect to see a return to top-line growth in the second half of the year and the potential to hit record quarterly revenue during that timeframe. Today’s guidance and wider range also reflects anticipated shifts in the timing of certain project deployments related to customers that are transitioning to new technologies.
In 2025, we expect our growth rate to accelerate from 2024 levels as our larger customers ramp up their spend levels in the second half of 2024, which should build greater momentum as we enter 2025. For our Video segment in Q1 on slide 12, we expect revenue in the range of $40 to $50 million, gross margin in the range of 60% to 61%, gross profit in the range of $24 million to $31 million, and adjusted EBITDA to range from negative $8 million to negative $2 million.
For the full year, we expect revenue between $195 million to $210 million, gross margins between 60% to 62%, gross profit between $117 million to $130 million, and adjusted EBITDA to range from negative $7 million to positive $2 million. For Video, we continue to be conservative, reflecting the ongoing strategic review and other macroeconomic factors I mentioned earlier.
Turning to slide 13, for the first quarter of 2024, we expect total company revenue in the range of $110 million to $130 million, gross margin in the range of 51.1% to 52.4%, gross profit to range from $56 million to $69 million, adjusted EBITDA to range from negative $4 million to positive $6 million.
A weighted average diluted share count of 111.7 million to 115.2 million and EPS to range from a loss of $0.06 to a profit of $0.02. And for the full year, we expect revenue between $655 million to $710 million, gross margins between 50.5% to 52%, gross profit between $331 million to $373 million, adjusted EBITDA between $88 million to $121 million. A weighted average diluted share count of 114.6 million and EPS to range from $0.49 to $0.72.
In summary, we reported solid fourth quarter results including record total company and Broadband segment revenue. We believe our Broadband segment continues to be well-positioned for future growth. In addition, our Video segment continued its strategic transformation and shift to SaaS during the fourth quarter.
Thank you everyone for your attention today, and now I will turn it back to Patrick for final remarks before we open up the call for questions.
Patrick Harshman
Thanks, Walter. In summary, as Walter just said, Harmonic delivered another strong quarter, capping a year of solid financial and operational execution despite industry-wide challenges. The company continues to be exceptionally well-positioned for sustained growth and create greater value for our shareholders. We remain focused and confident in our ability to execute, and we appreciate your confidence in us.
With that let’s now open up the call for some questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Simon Leopold of Raymond James. Please go ahead, Simon.
Simon Leopold
Great. Thank you very much for taking the question. I’m just sort of trying to figure out a little bit more of what’s going on within this Broadband segment in that when I sort of couple your first quarter revenue guidance with the full year, it would appear that the second quarter or back half of the year really expand dramatically from this first quarter, and I’m trying to get an understanding of what you’re assuming for that to happen, and I’ll be explicit you may not be in your answer but we recall last earnings period Charter talked about delaying some of its upgrades by perhaps six months and we know Comcast has started deploying DOCSIS 4.0, but some of your language in the prepared remarks sounded like you were making references to some slower aspects of the 4.0. So I’m just trying to discern what the real driver is and what the pattern might be through the year. Thank you.
Walter Jankovic
Hi, Simon. I’ll start that and then ask Patrick to jump in as well. Let me first start by identifying how our guidance is set up and address those two points that you’ve brought up. Definitely, from a Q1 standpoint you see where our guidance is, the expectation is we return to growth — year-on-year growth in the second half, so Q3, Q4. What is giving us confidence in terms of providing that full-year guidance is predicated on two things. One is based on our backlog and contracts that we have with our customers, but more importantly, with regards to the recent conversations that we’ve been having with key customers in terms of their deployment plans in 2024 and so the guidance reflects the information, the latest information that we have by working with our customers to identify the technology transitions when they expect to ramp and that’s reflected in the guidance. In regards to the two technologies specifically, definitely, there is customers ramping up and moving over to 4.0 and that’s going to take some deployment time as Patrick mentioned earlier, and with regards to our other customer that’s ramping up, I mentioned the alignment with regards to the plans and the deployment plans that that customer has. Patrick, would you like to add?
Patrick Harshman
No, I think you’ve covered it, but I’ll ask you Simon if that’s clear. If you have any more specific follow-up.
Simon Leopold
Actually, I’ve got a different follow-up and this is just much more of the sort of broader topic in that, you highlighted sort of the 15% coverage to date, we know Comcast has been working at its own initiative for about four years, that’s backwards looking. If you were to sort of take a look at what’s in front of you and your pipeline, can you give us sort of your thinking of how many years this cycle should last for you?
Patrick Harshman
Well, I think it is a tough question, Simon, but I mean — a top level answer is certainly another four to five years. You’ve kind of got some cross currents. On one hand, we are customers the market have learned a lot, so the deployment pace today can and should be much faster than it was when this whole initiative started four years ago. On the other hand, as we all have seen, some customers are just inclined for a variety of reasons to move more slowly, particularly in regards to getting the programs up and running. So you’ve got both of those things kind of ongoing somewhat offsetting themselves. So in summary, I expect the pace going forward to be slightly faster than the pace that we’ve seen to date, but not dramatically so, and I think that sets us up for four, five, six plus strong years of investments and opportunity in this area.
Simon Leopold
Great. Thank you for taking the questions.
Walter Jankovic
Thanks, Simon.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Koontz of Needham and Company. Please go ahead, Ryan.
Ryan Koontz
Thanks for the question. I wonder if we could just step back also and talk about your North America Tier 1s? Obviously, we’re familiar with Comcast and your win at Charter, but without naming names, can you refresh us on where we are with the other North America Tier 1s that you have wins with maybe without naming names, but talking about them in generality?
Patrick Harshman
Sure, Ryan. We’ve — I think we’ve previously stated that actually out of the top five, we’ve received some kind of order or some level of business with the top three. And as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we won another Top 10 just this past quarter. So our coverage is not 100% but is now over 50% and each of those customers is moving forward with different set of priorities, different paces. To-date, frankly, out of the two biggest names, I think the pace has been a little bit slower than we would have expected if you roll the clock back to a year or two ago, but we see growing signs of that improving. One of the things that’s kept some folks on the sideline, as you know, has been a question about DOCSIS 4 and different variants of that technology and the success that we’re seeing rolling that out, I think is being very well received by the market both existing customers, we’re trying to figure out exactly how to move forward, as well as prospective customers who are kind of waiting for the right stepping off point. So the momentum is strong. The position is strong. There are a couple of additional accounts to win and there’s a lot of really good work ahead of us and plans actively being worked with customers have yet to really start scaling in earnest.
Ryan Koontz
Okay, that’s super helpful, Patrick, thank you. And maybe double-clicking on your comment there around and DOCSIS 4, and I know in your prepared remarks you mentioned the amplifier supply and these sort of things, can you unpack that a little bit for us there in terms of your assumptions that go into your DOCSIS 4 migration in terms of dependence on other things that you can’t control, be they Broadcom ships whatever [indiscernible] programs
Patrick Harshman
Yeah, so, right, so I appreciate the question and we were trying to illuminate that a little bit more. Indeed, for a customer to turn on an end-to-end DOCSIS 4 system other things need to be in place, a DOCSIS 4 modem and most architectures some kind of DOCSIS 4 amplifier, et cetera. However, the important thing to understand is that our new DOCSIS 4.0 technology can be run in a DOCSIS 3.1 mode. So if you’re a customer and you’ve got to deploy, I’ll make it up, Akron, Ohio, you may not be ready with the modem and the RF amplifiers, but you made nonetheless choose to buy DOCSIS 4 capable nodes now rather than regrettable spend DOCSIS 3.1 limited nodes if that makes sense. So we’re seeing some rethinking by customers and we’re definitely not seeing in all cases purchasing or in planning and deployment of our DOCSIS 4.0 capable technology being in any way limited by the broader ecosystem. And so that kind of brings us full circle to one large customer has decided to really pivot almost fully what they’re deploying with us to the DOCSIS 4.0 Version. I think that’s great. It takes advantage of our new technology and really further strengthens our position. In the short-term, as you can see from our guidance as we just discussed with Simon, this does mean we’ve kind of got a little bit funny shape to the curve, a slower first half followed by what we think is going to be a very aggressive second half and — but net-net it doesn’t diminish the total opportunity and it certainly does not put us on the sidelines waiting for any other third-party product or elements of the solution. Is that clear or helpful?
Ryan Koontz
That’s great. One quick follow-up there. Yes, that’s perfect, Patrick, thank you. And with regards to your DOCSIS 4, is any of this second half load — is it more dependent on your customer’s demand or is it your own supply chain holding things up there in terms of the second half weight on broadband?
Patrick Harshman
Specifically regarding DOCSIS 4, it’s more about our customers. I mean, that being said, it’s a good question. I mean, the fact is, we could not ship DOCSIS 4.0 in infinite quantities today even if we wanted to. So frankly, we’re all in a kind of a ramp-up of the supply chain, of the deployment experience, and maturation, et cetera. So everything is converging, but I think if you have to point to something that could be a limiting factor, it’s more on the demand side. We feel quite good about where we are with the technology and that we’re going to be in good shape to supply quite heavy demand in the second half. In fact, as you’ve heard from Walter, that is our plan.
Ryan Koontz
Great. Thank you so much.
Patrick Harshman
Thanks.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steven Frankel of Rosenblatt. Please go ahead, Steven.
Steven Frankel
Good afternoon. Patrick, let’s talk about the other set of customers. There were a large number of customers entering SCTE that hadn’t really figured out their deployment plans kind of where are we with those, and how big a percentage of that group is likely in the 4.0 camp, and so they’re going to be back half weighted as well?
Patrick Harshman
Yeah, that’s right, Steve. It’s an excellent question and an excellent point. Look, there is not — certainly domestically, there is not a significant cable operator who is not contemplating DOCSIS 4.0 for at least part of their strategy. And so it’s part of the dialog with everyone and it’s part of the dynamic for better or worse. And again, what we’re talking about here is not the scale of the opportunity, in fact, DOCSIS 4.0 expands the opportunity from our perspective, but it does have certain implications on the timing for all the reasons we’ve just discussed. And indeed, while — I’d say the typical, let’s say, mid-sized operator is still probably has 3.1 more central to their near-term plans, understanding and figuring out their 4.0 strategy, particularly for their most competitive areas is mission-critical for them and it’s very much core to the planning discussions with us and to the anticipated scaling. Indeed, as you said, pushing things a little bit more back half this year.
Steven Frankel
Okay. And then, on the Fiber business, maybe a little more color on the progress you’re making with new opportunities in the pure fiber area.
Patrick Harshman
Well, I mean, for us it’s all new opportunity, Steve. I mean, as I mentioned, we’ve won quite a bit of business with some significant existing cable accounts, but actually very often within those accounts, it’s a different team. This could be a team dealing with business services, services to MDUs, as well as the groups who are expanding the footprint, the so called edge-out activity acquiring new homes passed. So we’re making good progress there. We’ve had a couple of very significant design wins. Last year was actually quite a good year from a particularly new order input point of view. One of the things we discovered, particularly internationally though is that there was a couple of holes in the product line. For instance, we focused on 10G initially and there’s a number of accounts that are really also looking for complementary one-gig solution still, legacy solution. So we’ve added some capabilities around that, really I think bullet-proofing our offering and giving us a more complete end-to-end solution for domestic and international operators, and this is looking at both cable as well as new, let’s say, traditional telecom or fiber first operators. And we’re also excited about the progress we’re making there with those new non-cable accounts against several good wins late last year and a pretty strong pipeline, and actually it’s going after those accounts, that’s one of the key areas of focus for us in terms of scaling up our go-to-market capability.
Steven Frankel
And would you remind us how many fiber-first customers you have today?
Patrick Harshman
I don’t think we’ve quoted that and I think that’s not a metric we want to get into, but it’s more than just several. How about that, Steve?
Steven Frankel
Okay, great. Thank you.
Patrick Harshman
Okay, thanks.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of George Notter of Jefferies. Your question, please, George.
George Notter
Hi, guys, thanks very much. Hey, if I go back to last quarter, I think there was a conversation about customers carrying excess inventory, I guess I was thinking about it more in the context of Comcast, but could you give us a sense for what that looks like? Did that inventory get burned off here in Q4 or is that still something that’s kind of lingering going forward?
Walter Jankovic
No, in terms of what we talked about last year, George, in terms of orders that got pushed out, those orders were fulfilled in Q4 that was part of the impact you would see there on inventory, for example, the reduction in inventory. So we were holding inventory that was ready to go a couple of quarters ago and we’ve now flushed that out in Q4.
George Notter
Got it. Okay. And then also what about inventory that is in the possession of your customers. Is there a comment on that as well?
Walter Jankovic
No specific comment, George, in terms of having direct access to see exactly what’s in their pipeline in terms of let it be 3.1 nodes or 4.0 is just getting started. So there’s very little inventory in the pipeline because that’s just getting started now.
George Notter
Got it. Okay. So, is that part of the narrative here that as you see customers transition from 3.1 to 4.0, your business trends are softer now because they’re adjusting inventories or is it in fact that it’s a different skew then that they’re buying as they deploy 4.0 or how do I think about kind of how the customers approaching their own inventories of your products as they go through this transition? Thanks.
Walter Jankovic
Yes, certainly, George. Well, as Patrick mentioned earlier, with regards to deployment around 4.0 nodes and their backward compatibility in terms of ability to put those notes in place in the network and not regret putting a 3.1 and having to go back in short order and upgrade to a 4.0 node. So I think we’re seeing a level of planning around that as customers look at how they’re going to leverage our 4.0 nodes that have that backward compatibility. So I think that’s a big driver in terms of the technology transition, specifically to 4.0.
George Notter
Got it. For you, is that a different SKU that you’re selling into a customer like Comcast?
Walter Jankovic
Certainly, 4.0 is a different SKU than 3.1.
Patrick Harshman
Yeah, George, it’s a different hardware design, it’s a different core trip, it’s a different RF design to support the DOCSIS 4 capabilities, so for the edge devices it is a different hardware design and it’s also additional incremental capability functionality on the software — the core software piece.
George Notter
Got it. Right. And, I guess, so the question I’m asking is, is that a source of the softness that you see here in the first part of the year? Customers depleting any remaining inventory of 3.1 nodes in advance of cutting over to 4.0?
Patrick Harshman
So, it’s part of the story. I don’t think it’s the whole story, but for one customer in particular, George, it’s a big part of the story. Yeah, if you’re gearing up for 4.0, you’re not only just right sizing your inventory, you’re actually bleeding your legacy inventory down hard, right? We have another significant customer that for their own reasons is just the natural curve of their ramp-up is still, I’d say, ramping up moderately through the first half and kind of hitting the knee of the curve sometime in Q2 and really getting to a much heavier pace of deployment in Q3 and Q4. That’s a customer who is relatively newer to deployment and that’s consistent with what we’ve seen in the past with other customers who are in their, let’s say, first year of major rollout. So we’ve got two separate things working at the same time and coincidentally both following the same kind of lighter first half, stronger second half curve kind of multiplying the effect. Did that makes sense?
George Notter
That helps. Thank you, guys, very much.
Patrick Harshman
Thank you.
Walter Jankovic
Thanks, George.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux of Northland. Please go ahead, Tim.
Tim Savageaux
Thanks, and good afternoon. The question is on kind of the nature of your initial ramp with Charter I guess and what you might expect going forward. And I guess I want to come at that from a couple of directions, first, you saw weaker gross margins in Q4, do we infer that that’s hardware-heavy initial mix or some kind of stocking or there is a relationship there at all remembering that you had a big upfront software license with Comcast at that initial deployment? And then relative to and assuming that most of the charter revenue is — vast majority is Broadband and really wasn’t much in any of anything last quarter, how would you relate that ramp to what you saw historically with Comcast? And I can remember times when you were at similar levels and on up to doing $50 million, $60 million a quarter, probably on the Broadband side. So when you talk about that second half ramp, should we think about those types of metrics to try and define what you mean with Charter in particular?
Walter Jankovic
Hey, Tim, it’s Walter. So we’re not going to specifically talk about any particular customer’s ramp, but I think there’s a couple of things there that you passed that we’ll address. First of all, in regards to the margins for Q4 in Broadband specifically. So as we highlighted in our opening remarks, we had a significant higher mix of nodes go out in the Q4 time period, more than we had anticipated going into the quarter. Part of that was other customers who came in with orders that they wanted fulfilled in the quarter and so we prioritized that, and so when we look at our mix of business, heavy mix of nodes in Q4 and that drove down the Broadband margin compared to what we’ve seen historically. Second point that I will highlight here in terms of how to think about the margin profile as we move forward, across the customer base as we look at customers in terms of moving forward, customers acquire the nodes, they acquire licenses, software licenses to enable those nodes once those get put into the network and so as we’ve highlighted before, quarter-to-quarter the margins will fluctuate depending on the mix over a longer period of time, such as a year, you average those puts and takes and you’ll see more of a normalized mix of the COS coupled with the nodes that are going out in broadband. So I addressed a couple of your questions, Tim, is there — maybe there’s something I missed from the ones that you listed out here? Did I address them?
Tim Savageaux
Yeah, I think so. As a follow-up question, you mentioned the prospects for an accelerating growth rate in ’25 as new customers kind of get ramped up, can you offer any kind of commentary because you mentioned over a year gross margins are normalized you’re guiding into the high 40s, let’s say, 47 something like that. As the business scales, if we’re looking at ’25 is 50% on the table from a gross margin perspective or do you expect to hardware mix to be heavy enough that this range is a reasonable range to expect where we are currently? Thanks.
Walter Jankovic
That’s a good question. Tim, the way I would look at FY’24, it’s a transitional year with regards to a lot of nodes that are going out into the networks as we look forward beyond 2024, I would say, that the mix will likely be slightly improved in terms of the mix of our cOS as compared to our hardware. But as you can imagine, there are many factors and some of the ones that Patrick highlighted earlier with regards to our focus around fiber as well that has an impact in terms of the overall margins for the business.
Tim Savageaux
Okay. Thanks very much.
Walter Jankovic
Okay. Thanks, Tim.
Operator
Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Patrick Harshman for closing remarks. Sir?
Patrick Harshman
Okay. Well, thank you again for joining us today. We’re pleased with our strong quarter and we’re excited about the opportunities ahead of us and we’re determined to execute in 2024, 2025, and beyond. We appreciate your support. We’re confident in our ability to execute and we look forward to continuing to be in close dialog with you as we go forward. Thanks again, everyone. Have a good day.
Operator
This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
